| Improving Outcomes with Antithrombotics in Patients at Risk of Vascular Events |
| | Improving outcomes with antithrombotics in patients at risk of vascular events Dutch Atherosclerosis Society 25 March 2010 |
|
| „Fathers“ of invasive cardiology |
| | Lenfant C. N Engl J Med 2003;349:868-974 |
|
| Plaque growth and rupture |
| | Plaque ruptuur met totale afsluiting |
|
| The great attack on plaque growth and rupture |
| | Balance of Hemostasis and Thrombosis |
|
| Adapted from Brouwer MA, Verheugt FWA. Circulation 2002;105:1270-1274 |
| | Aspirin and P2Y12 ADP Antagonists:Mechanisms of Action |
|
| Slide 11 |
| | ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES |
|
| Slide 13 |
| | ASSENT-2. Lancet 1999;354:716-722 |
|
| Primary PCI versus Thrombolysis |
| | Slide 16 |
|
| ASPIRIN AND HEPARIN PRIOR TO PRIMARY PCI |
| | Clopidogrel Trials – ACS/CAD |
|
| Ross AM. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1954-1962 |
| | Van den Merkhof LFM. JACC 1999;33:1528-1532 |
|
| Adjunctive abciximab has been shown to reduce mortality in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI Mortality 6 Months |
| | ESC PCI Guidelines |
|
| The most critical point for PPCI is TIME GOLDEN PERIOD for myocardial salvage is first 2 hrs |
| | In-ambulance abciximab administration in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI is associated with smaller infarct size, improved LV function and lower incidence of heart failure: Results from the Leiden MISSION! infarct treatment optimization program Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Epub 2009 Jan |
|
| The MISSION! protocol is a rigorously standardized protocol. Contains a pre-hospital, in-hospital, and outpatient clinical framework for decision making and treatment, up to 1 year after the index event. |
| | Aim of our Mission! Early vs late abciximab study |
|
| Study groups |
| | End points of the study |
|
| Results |
| | Baseline characteristics of the study population |
|
| TREATMENT TIME INTERVALS |
| | Angiographic and procedural results |
|
| Primary angiographic endpoint: IRA patency |
| | Aborted Myocardial Infarction in patients with STEMI treated with PPCI and early (in ambulance) vs late (in cathlab) abciximab. |
|
| Secondary endpoints: 1) ST- segment resolution ≥ 70% at 90 min post PPCI |
| | Secondary endpoints: 2) Enzymatic infarct size (by cumulative 48h CK release) |
|
| Secondary endpoints: 3) Three-month LV function results by gated SPECT |
| | Clinical outcome at follow-up (median 7 months) |
|
| Limitations |
| | Key findings of the early vs late abciximab MISSION substudy (STEMI patients treated with PPCI) |
|
| (n=3,366) |
| | (n=3,366) |
|
| BRAVE-3 presented ACC 08 |
| | BRAVE-3 presented ACC 08 |
|
| BRAVE-3 presented ACC 08 |
| | ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES |
|
| NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
| | NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
|
| Slide 49 |
| | Slide 50 |
|
| Clopidogrel Trials – ACS/CAD |
| | Oral Antithrombotics |
|
| NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
| | NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
|
| Aspirin and P2Y12 ADP Antagonists:Mechanisms of Action |
| | Background |
|
| Prasugrel: Active Metabolite FormationFaster Onset of IPA |
| | Is faster always better to reach your goal? |
|
| Healthy VolunteerCrossover Study |
|
|
| Balance of Efficacy and Safety |
| | Ticagrelor (AZD 6140): an oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist |
|
| Note: Prasugrel must be metabolized to its active form. For Ticagrelor, both the parent compound and metabolites are active. |
| | Study Objectives |
|
| NSTE-ACS (Trop 80%) STEMI (if primary PCI 37%) Clopidogrel-treated or -naive; randomised within 24 hours of index event (N=18,624) |
| | Wallentin L et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045-57 |
|
| Wallentin L et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045-57 |
| | PLATO |
|
| Bleeding Definitions |
| | PLATO vs. TRITON: Key Differences |
|
| PLATO vs. TRITON: Key Differences |
| | Slide 72 |
|
| NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
| | Balance of Hemostasis and Thrombosis |
|
| Aspirin and P2Y12 ADP Antagonists:Mechanisms of Action |
| | Development Strategy for Thrombin Receptor Antagonist |
|
| TRA Background |
| | Research = Investigation! |
|
| Patients with high-risk Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome |
| | NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
|
| NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
| | Adapted from Brouwer MA, Verheugt FWA. Circulation 2002;105:1270-1274 |
|
| Desirable qualities of a new anticoagulant |
| | 84 |
|
| Slide 85 |
| | PROPERTIES OF PATENTERAL ANTICOAGULANTS |
|
| Simoons ML. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2183-2190 |
| | Simoons ML. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2183-2190 |
|
| N Engl J Med 2006;354:1464-76 |
| | N Engl J Med 2006;354:1464-76 |
|
| N Engl J Med 2006;354:1464-76 |
| | NOVEL LONG-TERM Anti-Coagulants Anti-Platelet Agents |
|
| ESTEEM |
| | Slide 94 |
|
| RE-LY |
| | Connoly SJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139-1151. |
|
| Conclusion RELY: in NVAF dabigatran is better, safer and more user-friendly than warfarin |
| | Combined analysis of dabigatran trials |
|
| Conclusions |
| | NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents II. Anti-Coagulants |
|
| Slide 101 |
| | APPRAISE |
|
| APPRAISE |
| | 104 |
|
| 105 |
| | 106 |
|
| 107 |
| | 108 |
|
| ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46 |
| | Antithrombotic Therapy in ACS 2009 |
|
| NOVEL LONG-TERM I. Anti-Platelet Agents (Prasugrel/Ticagrelor/Thrombin-Rec.-Inhib.) II. Anti-Coagulants (Factor Xa inhibitors, Thrombin (fact II) inhibitors) |
| | New Antithrombotics- |
|
Deel deze pagina met collega's en vrienden: